NitiBench+ - Gold context In-force: leaderboard

NitiBench+ Table 17:500 held-out Thai legal questions; three distinct evidence settings. Bar-standard answer scores 0–10; citation precision/recall/F 1 fractions 0–1. avg@3 for 13 self-hosted bf 16 models; other rows are leaderboard API observations, not replicated avg@3. AppendixC exact checkpoints and reasoning-on controls retained; other API effort unspecified. Same official judging rubric; citations checked against current in-force law. The public live site was 403, resolved via complete native paper table. Metric: Bar-standard score (0–10).

Metric: Bar-standard score (0–10). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around March 2027. 26 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Fable 5.18.04#10
2GPT-6.1 Sol7.69#7
3Gemini 4 Argon7.63#9
4Claude Opus 5.57.56#3
5Muse Spark 1.37.09#31
6Claude Sonnet 5.56.67#14
7DeepSeek V4.1 Flash6.38#37
8GPT-6.1 Terra6.21#15
9DeepSeek V4 Flash6.19#155
10Qwen 3.8 27B6.04#123
11Claude Haiku 5.55.36#43
12Gemma 4 31B (IT) (Thinking)5.16#178 (Gemma 4 31B (IT))
13gemma-4-26B-A4B-it (Thinking)4.84
14NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-BF16 (Thinking)4.29#394 (NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-BF16)
15Qwen 3 8B2.57#678

No result here: #6 GPT-6 Astra.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=nitibench-plus-gold-context-in-force · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.