NitiBench+ - Cited sections precision: leaderboard

NitiBench+ Table 17:500 held-out Thai legal questions; three distinct evidence settings. Bar-standard answer scores 0–10; citation precision/recall/F 1 fractions 0–1. avg@3 for 13 self-hosted bf 16 models; other rows are leaderboard API observations, not replicated avg@3. AppendixC exact checkpoints and reasoning-on controls retained; other API effort unspecified. Same official judging rubric; citations checked against current in-force law. The public live site was 403, resolved via complete native paper table. Metric: Precision (0–1).

Metric: Precision (0–1). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around July 2028. 26 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemma 4 31B (IT) (Thinking)0.64#178 (Gemma 4 31B (IT))
2GPT-6.1 Sol0.61#7
3GPT-6.1 Terra0.58#15
4Gemini 4 Argon0.55#9
5Claude Sonnet 5.50.53#14
6Muse Spark 1.30.53#31
7Claude Opus 5.50.5#3
8NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-BF16 (Thinking)0.5#394 (NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-BF16)
9DeepSeek V4 Flash0.48#155
10Claude Haiku 5.50.45#43
11Qwen 3.8 27B0.4#123
12Claude Fable 5.10.39#10
13DeepSeek V4.1 Flash0.37#37
14gemma-4-26B-A4B-it (Thinking)0.36
15Qwen 3 8B0#678

No result here: #6 GPT-6 Astra.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=nitibench-plus-cited-sections-precision · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.