NitiBench+ - Cited sections F1: leaderboard

NitiBench+ Table 17:500 held-out Thai legal questions; three distinct evidence settings. Bar-standard answer scores 0–10; citation precision/recall/F 1 fractions 0–1. avg@3 for 13 self-hosted bf 16 models; other rows are leaderboard API observations, not replicated avg@3. AppendixC exact checkpoints and reasoning-on controls retained; other API effort unspecified. Same official judging rubric; citations checked against current in-force law. The public live site was 403, resolved via complete native paper table. Metric: F 1 (0–1).

Metric: F1 (0–1). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around August 2027. 26 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-6.1 Sol0.66#7
2Gemini 4 Argon0.63#9
3GPT-6.1 Terra0.62#15
4Claude Opus 5.50.59#3
5Claude Sonnet 5.50.58#14
6Muse Spark 1.30.58#31
7DeepSeek V4 Flash0.54#155
8Claude Fable 5.10.52#10
9Claude Haiku 5.50.51#43
10Gemma 4 31B (IT) (Thinking)0.5#178 (Gemma 4 31B (IT))
11Qwen 3.8 27B0.48#123
12DeepSeek V4.1 Flash0.48#37
13NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-BF16 (Thinking)0.42#394 (NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-BF16)
14gemma-4-26B-A4B-it (Thinking)0.25
15Qwen 3 8B0#678

No result here: #6 GPT-6 Astra.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=nitibench-plus-cited-sections-f1 · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.