Nejumi 4 - Total Score: leaderboard

The headline number of Nejumi 4, the Japanese leaderboard run by Weights and Biases, computed as a weighted mean over the suite's second-level categories. Reasoning, knowledge and question answering, and application development count double, while applied language, foundational language and each of the six alignment categories count once. Higher is better. Source: github.com/wandb/llm-leaderboard.

Metric: Score (%). Source: nejumi.ai. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 139 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 587.2#12
2Claude Fable 586.99#16
3Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B85.98#55
4Claude Opus 4.885.23#37
5Claude Opus 4.785.09#49
6GPT-5.6 Sol84.99#19
7GPT-5.6 Terra84.4#41
8Kimi K384.32#30
9Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)84.3#58
10GPT-5.5 (2026-04-23)84.11#22
11GPT-5.4 (2026-03-05)83.97#59
12Claude Opus 4.683.94#63
13Muse Spark Open83.79#54
14Hy4 preview83.44#38
15Gemini 3.6 Flash83.12#51

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=nejumi-4-total-score · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.