Nejumi 4 - GLP - Semantic Analysis: leaderboard

Japanese natural language inference items from the jaster harness, drawn from JNLI, JaNLI, JSeM, JSICK and JAMP, where the model labels the relation between a premise and a hypothesis. Each dataset is the mean of its 0-shot and 2-shot runs graded by exact match, and the board averages them in percent where higher is better. Source: github.com/wandb/llm-leaderboard.

Metric: Score (%). Source: nejumi.ai. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 139 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 587.1#12
2Kimi K386.4#30
3Claude Opus 4.886.2#37
4Qwen 3.6 Max Preview86.1#85
5GPT-5.6 Sol86#19
6GPT-5.6 Terra85.9#41
7Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)85.8#58
8Claude Opus 4.685.8#63
9Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B85.7#55
10GPT-5.5 (2026-04-23)85.6#22
11Ornith-1.5-397B85.6
12Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)85.4#82
13Gemini 3.6 Flash85.3#51
14Claude Sonnet 4.685.1#90
15Claude Opus 4.585#83

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=nejumi-4-glp-semantic-analysis · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.