Nejumi 4 - GLP - Coding: leaderboard

Averages three coding measures: the resolution rate on the 80-issue Japanese SWE-Bench subset; JHumanEval, a Japanese translation of HumanEval scored as the mean of its unit-test pass rate and a pylint error check; and the MT-Bench coding questions rated by an LLM judge. The board is the mean of those parts in percent where higher is better. Source: github.com/wandb/llm-leaderboard.

Metric: Score (%). Source: nejumi.ai. Saturation forecast: Around September 2027. 139 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 590.81#12
2Claude Fable 572.2#16
3Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)71.55#82
4Muse Spark Open71.21#54
5Claude Opus 4.869.12#37
6Kimi K368.47#30
7Qwen3.8-Flash-Next68.19#72
8Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B68.12#55
9Gemma 4 31B (IT)67.99#176
10GLM-5.367.98#39
11GPT-5.6 Sol67.9#19
12Hy367.9#93
13Claude Sonnet 4.667.44#90
14Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (Preview)67.4#194
15GPT-5.5 (2026-04-23)67.34#22

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=nejumi-4-glp-coding · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.