Nejumi 4 - GLP - Application Development: leaderboard

An aggregate of Nejumi 4's two application development sub-scores. Coding averages the Japanese SWE-Bench subset, JHumanEval and the MT-Bench coding questions; function calling is overall accuracy on a Japanese localisation of BFCL v3, covering single-turn, multi-turn and irrelevance detection. The board is the mean of the two in percent, higher is better. Source: github.com/wandb/llm-leaderboard.

Metric: Score (%). Source: nejumi.ai. Saturation forecast: Around June 2028. 139 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 580.38#12
2Claude Fable 570.95#16
3Claude Opus 4.870.52#37
4GPT-5.6 Sol70.21#19
5Claude Opus 4.769.44#49
6Claude Sonnet 4.667.95#90
7Gemma 4 31B (IT)67.91#176
8Qwen 3.6 Max Preview67.68#85
9Kimi K367.64#30
10Claude Opus 4.567.31#83
11GLM-5.266.97#73
12GPT-5.5 (2026-04-23)66.97#22
13GLM-5.3 Flash66.8#65
14Qwen3.8-Flash-Next66.78#72
15Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)66.76#58

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=nejumi-4-glp-application-development · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.