Nejumi 4 - BFCL - Non-Live AST: leaderboard

Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard as adapted and sampled by Nejumi Leaderboard 4 (Weights & Biases Japan): abstract-syntax-tree accuracy on the non-live simple and multiple-function categories. Accuracy (%), higher is better; the overall accuracy is Nejumi 4 - GLP - Function Calling.

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: nejumi.ai. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 145 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Grok 385.93#313
2Claude Sonnet 4 (Non-reasoning)84.07#207 (Claude Sonnet 4)
3Gemini 2.5 Flash82.96#255
4Qwen 3 30B A3B 2507 (Thinking)82.96#379
5Claude Opus 4 (Non-reasoning)82.59#170 (Claude Opus 4)
6Claude Opus 4.7 (xHigh)82.22#51 (Claude Opus 4.7)
7GPT-4o (2024-11-20)81.85#392
8Claude Sonnet 4 (Thinking)81.85#207 (Claude Sonnet 4)
9qwen2.5-bakeneko-32B-instruct-v281.85#570
10Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)81.48#71
11Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 (Thinking)81.48#263
12GPT-OSS-Swallow-20B-RL-v0.1 (Thinking)81.48#451 (GPT-OSS-Swallow-20B-RL-v0.1)
13O1 (2024-12-17) (High)81.48#157 (O1 (2024-12-17))
14Qwen 3 Max (Preview)81.11#248
15Qwen 3.5 122B A10B (Thinking)81.11#184 (Qwen 3.5 122B A10B)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=nejumi-4-bfcl-non-live-ast · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.