MuseBench - Cinematic Arts (Multi-Select): leaderboard

MuseBench evaluates intent-level audiovisual-arts understanding in multimodal models over 4,016 questions from video essays in four art categories (cinematic, static visual, stage performing, game arts), with single-select and multi-select framings. This board reports Cinematic-arts exact-match accuracy (%) on multi-select questions; higher is better.

Metric: Cinematic-arts exact-match accuracy (%) on multi-select questions; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2032. 28 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3.5 397B A17B33.33#246
2GPT-5.431.58#123
3Claude Opus 4.631.58#102
4Qwen 3.5 Plus29.04#232
5InternVL3-8B28.07#1688
6Qwen2.5-Omni-7B21.44#1789
7Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)15.98#94
8GLM-4.5V14.62#744
9InternVL3-78B14.23#738
10Gemma 4 E4B11.89#2214
11Grok 4.16.63#476
12Kimi K2.52.73#256

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=musebench-cinematic-arts-multi-select · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.