MultivationBench: leaderboard

MultivationBench (HKUST, Findings of EMNLP 2026) tests motivation reasoning about characters in story-driven visual narratives under the Maslow hierarchy of needs and the 16 Reiss basic desires, from the accumulated story images and text. The score is exact-match accuracy of the predicted motivation set in percent, on the common subset of tasks every model answered; higher is better.

Metric: Exact-match accuracy (%, predicted option set equals the gold set) of multi-label motivation predictions for visually grounded character behaviors in sequential visual narratives, reasoning over the accumulated story images and text (Maslow 8-level needs and Reiss 16 basic desires, definition and practical-motivation tasks), zero-shot at temperature 0; multimodal input, common subset of 14,180 tasks from 1,000 stories that every model answered; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2032. 8 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct39.22#3882
2Gemini 3 Flash36.09#164
3Llama 4 Scout33.48#1776
4Grok 4.1 Fast32.53#430
5Llama 4 Maverick30.28#1099
6O4 Mini27.29#353
7Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL8.58#2231

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=multivationbench · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.