MultiChallenge-LILT - Korean: leaderboard

MultiChallenge-LILT - Korean: Pass@1 accuracy (%) in LILT Aurora's localized evaluation. Multi-turn conversational instruction following; target model effort unreported.

Metric: Pass@1 accuracy (%). Source: aurora.lilt.com. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 9 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.8 Flash (Aurora Run: MultiChallenge-LILT; effort unreported)60.2
2Claude Opus 5.5 (Aurora Run: MultiChallenge-LILT; effort unreported)57.85
3GPT-5.6 Sol (Aurora Run: MultiChallenge-LILT; effort unreported)54.58
4Claude Opus 5 (Aurora Run: MultiChallenge-LILT; effort unreported)54.13
5GPT-6 Sol (Aurora Run: MultiChallenge-LILT; effort unreported)51.44
6Nemotron 3 Ultra (Aurora Run: MultiChallenge-LILT; effort unreported)50.29
7Kimi K3 (Aurora Run: MultiChallenge-LILT; effort unreported)43.11
8Command A+ (Aurora Run: MultiChallenge-LILT; effort unreported)40.86
9Mistral Medium 3.5 (Aurora Run: MultiChallenge-LILT; effort unreported)37.64

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=multichallenge-lilt-korean · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.