MultiChallenge-LILT - English: leaderboard

MultiChallenge-LILT - English: Pass@1 accuracy (%) in LILT Aurora's localized evaluation. Multi-turn conversational instruction following; target model effort unreported.

Metric: Pass@1 accuracy (%). Source: aurora.lilt.com. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 9 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.6 Sol (Aurora Run: MultiChallenge-LILT; effort unreported)61.02
2Nemotron 3 Ultra (Aurora Run: MultiChallenge-LILT; effort unreported)59.97
3Claude Opus 5.5 (Aurora Run: MultiChallenge-LILT; effort unreported)59.96
4Gemini 3.8 Flash (Aurora Run: MultiChallenge-LILT; effort unreported)59.68
5Claude Opus 5 (Aurora Run: MultiChallenge-LILT; effort unreported)57.36
6GPT-6 Sol (Aurora Run: MultiChallenge-LILT; effort unreported)55.63
7Mistral Medium 3.5 (Aurora Run: MultiChallenge-LILT; effort unreported)47.63
8Kimi K3 (Aurora Run: MultiChallenge-LILT; effort unreported)46.51
9Command A+ (Aurora Run: MultiChallenge-LILT; effort unreported)44.07

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=multichallenge-lilt-english · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.