MuLA-Bench - Temporal Localization: leaderboard

Temporal questions in MuLA-Bench (Yang et al., 2026), a benchmark of open-ended questions over long in-the-wild recordings, answered from the audio alone, asking when an event happens on the clock, within 3 seconds, or in what order events occur. Each answer is judged correct or wrong by GPT-5.6 Sol against the reference with rubric and timing checks; accuracy in percent, higher is better.

Metric: Accuracy (%; the 1,008 temporal questions on event order and clock-time localization, both tracks; open-ended questions over in-the-wild long-form recordings (median 36.8 minutes, capped at three hours) in the source language, answered from the full recording without transcripts, audio clipped only to a local model's native input limit; each answer judged correct or not by GPT-5.6 Sol on a route-specific binary rubric with programmatic structural and 3-second timing checks; missing or invalid answers scored wrong). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 10 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.8 Flash66.67#36
2Gemini 3.7 Flash66.37#32
3Qwen 3.5 Omni Plus40.58#237
4Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)39.58#91
5Qwen3.5 Omni Flash27.68#548
6Muse Spark 1.213.19#97
7Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct11.11#902

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=mula-bench-temporal-localization · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.