MuLA-Bench - Narrative Domain: leaderboard
The narrative domain of the semantic track of MuLA-Bench (Yang et al., 2026), a benchmark of open-ended questions over long in-the-wild recordings, answered from the audio alone: 480 questions about spoken content in narrative and storytelling recordings, 30 in each of 16 languages. Each answer is judged correct or wrong by GPT-5.6 Sol against the reference with rubric and timing checks; accuracy in percent, higher is better.
Metric: Accuracy (%; the 480 semantic-track questions from narrative recordings, 30 in each of the 16 languages; open-ended questions over in-the-wild long-form recordings (median 36.8 minutes, capped at three hours) in the source language, answered from the full recording without transcripts, audio clipped only to a local model's native input limit; each answer judged correct or not by GPT-5.6 Sol on a route-specific binary rubric with programmatic structural and 3-second timing checks; missing or invalid answers scored wrong). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 8 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score | Overall rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini 3.8 Flash | 78.1 | #36 |
| 2 | Gemini 3.7 Flash | 76.5 | #32 |
| 3 | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) | 68.5 | #91 |
| 4 | Qwen 3.5 Omni Plus | 63.3 | #237 |
| 5 | Qwen3.5 Omni Flash | 48.7 | #548 |
| 6 | Muse Spark 1.2 | 28.1 | #97 |
No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=mula-bench-narrative-domain · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.