MuLA-Bench - Long-Range Retrieval: leaderboard

Long-range retrieval questions in MuLA-Bench (Yang et al., 2026), a benchmark of open-ended questions over long in-the-wild recordings, answered from the audio alone, whose evidence appears late in the recording or is spread over at least ten minutes. Each answer is judged correct or wrong by GPT-5.6 Sol against the reference with rubric and timing checks; accuracy in percent, higher is better.

Metric: Accuracy (%; the 993 long-range questions whose evidence starts late or spans at least ten minutes, both tracks; open-ended questions over in-the-wild long-form recordings (median 36.8 minutes, capped at three hours) in the source language, answered from the full recording without transcripts, audio clipped only to a local model's native input limit; each answer judged correct or not by GPT-5.6 Sol on a route-specific binary rubric with programmatic structural and 3-second timing checks; missing or invalid answers scored wrong). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 10 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.8 Flash85.3#36
2Gemini 3.7 Flash85.1#32
3Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)83.99#91
4Qwen 3.5 Omni Plus80.16#237
5Qwen3.5 Omni Flash65.46#548
6Muse Spark 1.248.74#97
7Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct34.04#902

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=mula-bench-long-range-retrieval · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.