MuLA-Bench - Chinese: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%; the 337 Chinese-language questions over both evidence tracks; open-ended questions over in-the-wild long-form recordings (median 36.8 minutes, capped at three hours) in the source language, answered from the full recording without transcripts, audio clipped only to a local model's native input limit; each answer judged correct or not by GPT-5.6 Sol on a route-specific binary rubric with programmatic structural and 3-second timing checks; missing or invalid answers scored wrong). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around December 2026. 8 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1Gemini 3.7 Flash74.8
2Gemini 3.8 Flash72.4
3Qwen 3.5 Omni Plus65.9
4Qwen3.5 Omni Flash56.4
5Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)55.8
6Muse Spark 1.222.6

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=mula-bench-chinese · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-09-26.