MuLA-Bench - Acoustic Evidence: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%; the 1,198 acoustic-track questions about naturally occurring non-speech or paralinguistic events such as laughter, applause and music; open-ended questions over in-the-wild long-form recordings (median 36.8 minutes, capped at three hours) in the source language, answered from the full recording without transcripts, audio clipped only to a local model's native input limit; each answer judged correct or not by GPT-5.6 Sol on a route-specific binary rubric with programmatic structural and 3-second timing checks; missing or invalid answers scored wrong). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around June 2027. 10 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScore
1Gemini 3.8 Flash55.26
2Gemini 3.7 Flash54.34
3Qwen 3.5 Omni Plus42.07
4Qwen3.5 Omni Flash27.63
5Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)26.63
6Muse Spark 1.224.71
7Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct11.6

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=mula-bench-acoustic-evidence · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-09-26.