MPRBench - Vision Average: leaderboard

Personalized multimodal reasoning from fixed concept profiles, visual references and interaction histories. Personalized QA accuracy (%). MPRBench v1 Table1 standalone general-model prompting baselines. Personal database converted into structured JSON context; fixed question/reference/distractor population. Subtask accuracy; group averages are weighted by QA counts and overall is the published weighted group mean. Trained personalized-token/retrieval/memory methods retain separate identities and are not silently relabeled as their backbone LLM; their admission remains a separate systems review.

Metric: Personalized QA accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Rough model projection: around 2026. 6 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5 (Benchmark Sweep Run: source=MPRBench; zero-shot structured-personal-database prompting; native base checkpoint/effort as published)80.3
2GPT-5 Mini (Benchmark Sweep Run: source=MPRBench; zero-shot structured-personal-database prompting; native base checkpoint/effort as published)79.9
3Gemini 2.5 Pro (Benchmark Sweep Run: source=MPRBench; zero-shot structured-personal-database prompting; native base checkpoint/effort as published)77.9
4GPT-4o (Benchmark Sweep Run: source=MPRBench; zero-shot structured-personal-database prompting; native base checkpoint/effort as published)70.6
5LLaVA-v1.5-13B (Benchmark Sweep Run: source=MPRBench; zero-shot structured-personal-database prompting; native base checkpoint/effort as published)60.2
6Qwen 2.5 VL 7B (Benchmark Sweep Run: source=MPRBench; zero-shot structured-personal-database prompting; native base checkpoint/effort as published)55.4

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=mprbench-vision-average · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-06.