MMPCBench - Premise Contradiction PCQ: leaderboard

MMPCBench (arXiv 2608.29286v1, Table 2): proactive critique of flawed multimodal inputs for 14 MLLMs; a judge panel of GPT-5.2, Gemini-3-Pro and Claude-Sonnet-4 scores the responses, and two of those judges are also evaluated. PCQ on inputs with cross-modal, inter-image or intra-text contradictions in their premises; 0-100, higher is better.

Metric: PCQ (0-100). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Not forecast. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct51.3#280
2Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct40.5#390
3Gemini 3 Pro39.2#82
4Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct37.9#419
5Gemini 3 Flash35.7#103
6Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)17.9#148 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
7Gemma 3 27B (IT)11.9#528
8Gemma 3 12B (IT)11.1#672
9GPT-5.210.7#115
10GPT-5.1 (High)7.2#145 (GPT-5.1)
11GLM-4.6V6.9#330
12GPT-5 Mini6.6#193
13Gemma 3 4B (IT)6#997

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=mmpcbench-premise-contradiction-pcq · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.