MMOOC - Uncertain Spatial and Physical Context (Yes/No): leaderboard

MMOOC tests whether multimodal models decline questions their image and context cannot answer, and explain why. This board covers yes or no questions where the spatial or physical situation cannot be settled from the image, and averages the share of correct refusals with a judge rating of the abstention reasoning.

Metric: Out-of-context score (%; mean of the refusal rate, the share of the Uncertain Spatial and Physical Context Yes/No questions, which the image and context cannot answer, that the model correctly declines, and refusal rationality, the mean 0-1 judge score of its abstention reasoning in steps of 0.25; judge scores averaged over GPT-5.6, Claude Opus 5 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro). Source: arxiv.org. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1O144.75#393
2Gemma 4 31B35.25#394
3GPT-4o30#741
4Ministral 3 14B28.5#1845
5Gemma 4 26B27.75#612
6Ministral 3 8B26.5#2023
7Qwen 3.5 122B A10B26.25#331
8Qwen 3.5 27B22.5#359
9Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)21.75#94
10Llama 4 Maverick19#1099
11O318#228
12Claude Opus 4.615.25#102
13InternVL3-8B12#1688

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=mmooc-uncertain-spatial-and-physical-context-yes-no · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.