MindEval2 MHQR GPT-6.1 Sol High: leaderboard

MindEval2 MHQR clinical response quality: weighted issue severity0/1/5/10, lower is better; 50 patients over3 sessions, 150 patient-session scores, 61819 replies. Counsellors temperature1 and provider defaults; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash thinking patient simulator. GPT-6.1 Sol High judge; same replies across judge variants. Shared-family self-preference and clinician disagreement are limitations; not a clinical-effectiveness claim. Metric: MHQR (0–10, lower better). Lower is better. Source: https://arxiv.org/html/2610.22314v1

Metric: MHQR (0–10, lower better). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.6 Terra0.84#39
2GPT-5.6 Sol0.91#18
3GPT-5.6 Luna1.13#68
4Claude Sonnet 52.22#54
5Kimi K32.51#29
6GLM-5.32.53#40
7Claude Opus 52.6#12
8Qwen 3.8 27B2.97#98
9Gemini 3.8 Flash3.08#21
10Qwen 3.5 397B A17B3.52#145
11Qwen 3.5 27B3.9#185
12Qwen 3.5 122B A10B4.12#171
13Gemma 4 31B4.12#197
14Gemma 4 26B A4B4.16#350
15Muse Glimmer 30B4.31#178

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #7 Gemini 4 Argon.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=mindeval2-mhqr-gpt-6-1-sol-high · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-17.