MindEval2 MHQR DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: leaderboard

MindEval2 MHQR clinical response quality: weighted issue severity0/1/5/10, lower is better; 50 patients over3 sessions, 150 patient-session scores, 61819 replies. Counsellors temperature1 and provider defaults; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash thinking patient simulator. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash judge; same replies across judge variants. Shared-family self-preference and clinician disagreement are limitations; not a clinical-effectiveness claim. Metric: MHQR (0–10, lower better). Lower is better. Source: https://arxiv.org/html/2610.22314v1

Metric: MHQR (0–10, lower better). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.6 Terra0.15#39
2GPT-5.6 Sol0.16#18
3GPT-5.6 Luna0.16#68
4Claude Opus 50.27#12
5GLM-5.30.27#40
6Claude Sonnet 50.32#54
7Kimi K30.44#29
8Gemini 3.8 Flash0.53#21
9Qwen 3.8 27B0.53#98
10Qwen 3.5 397B A17B1.07#145
11Muse Glimmer 30B1.45#178
12Gemma 4 31B1.64#197
13Qwen 3.5 27B1.79#185
14Gemma 4 26B A4B1.93#350
15Qwen 3.5 122B A10B1.96#171

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #7 Gemini 4 Argon.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=mindeval2-mhqr-deepseek-v4-1-flash · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-17.