MIBench-mini (Multimodal Interaction) - Text-Centric: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the text-centric samples (the answer must come from the text while the image context varies) on MIBench-mini, the paper's subset on which the closed-source models were also evaluated (multiple-choice image-text tasks; vision- and text-centric samples average several context variations); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 29 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)87.2#64
2O3 (2025-04-16)85#117
3Gemini 2.5 Pro84.4#145
4GPT-5.1 (2025-11-13)82.8#97
5Claude Sonnet 4.580.8#138
6GPT-5.280#105
7GPT-4o (2024-11-20)72.2#369
8Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct72#264
9Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct69.2#443
10Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct67.2#364
11InternVL3-8B65.2#606
12Qwen 2 VL 7B Instruct63.8#816
13Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct60.4#401
14Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct59.2#643
15InternVL2-8B59#826

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=mibench-mini-multimodal-interaction-text-centric · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.