MIBench-mini (Multimodal Interaction) - Synergy: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the synergy samples (both modalities are needed) on MIBench-mini, the paper's subset on which the closed-source models were also evaluated (multiple-choice image-text tasks; vision- and text-centric samples average several context variations); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 29 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)81#64
2Gemini 2.5 Pro76#145
3Claude Sonnet 4.572#138
4O3 (2025-04-16)72#117
5GPT-5.1 (2025-11-13)71#97
6GPT-5.270#105
7Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct60#264
8Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct59#364
9GPT-4o (2024-11-20)57#369
10Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct52#401
11Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct50#443
12Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct49#643
13InternVL3-8B45#606
14InternVL2-8B45#826
15Qwen 2 VL 7B Instruct43#816

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=mibench-mini-multimodal-interaction-synergy · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.