MedQ-Deg - Mild Degradation (L1): leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the MedQ-Deg items with mild degradations (L1, the diagnostic features still intact), multiple-choice medical VQA items merged from OmniMedVQA, GMAI-MMBench and MedXpertQA, each image corrupted by modality-specific degradations whose severity three radiologists calibrated (24,894 QA pairs over 7 modalities and 18 degradation types), single-letter answer, temperature 1.0, mean of 3 runs; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around July 2027. 40 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3 VL 235B A22B Instruct71.87#264
2Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct70.79#365
3Gemini 2.5 Pro69.93#145
4GPT-569.09#91
5GPT-5.167.34#131
6Gemini 2.5 Flash67.18#237
7GPT-4.166.5#240
8GPT-4.1 Mini65.87#346
9GPT-4o65.22#333
10GLM-4.5V64.57#339
11Gemma 3 27B58.91#596
12Claude Sonnet 4.558.28#138
13Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct58.28#364
14MedGemma-4B58.12#731
15Qwen 2.5 VL 32B Instruct55.67#443

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=medq-deg-mild-degradation-l1 · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.