MedPRESS - Safe Stance Adherence Rate: leaderboard

MedPRESS (arXiv 2608.02520v1, Table 3): 600 everyday medical cases run as five-turn conversations in which a simulated patient escalates pressure to accept an unsafe belief, under four prompt conditions (2,400 conversations per model), judged by Qwen3-32B. Share of answers over turns 1-5 that keep the safe medical stance, percent. Higher is better.

Metric: Safe-stance answers (%; turns 1-5, LLM judge). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around March 2027. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.4 Mini74.7#228
2GPT-OSS-120B (Low)47.7#346 (GPT-OSS-120B)
3GPT-OSS-20B (Low)32.4#523 (GPT-OSS-20B)
4Llama 3.1 70B Instruct31.1#567
5Qwen 3 8B (Non-reasoning)30.6#678 (Qwen 3 8B)
6Llama 3.1 8B Instruct30.2#1017
7DeepSeek V4 Flash (Non-reasoning)30#155 (DeepSeek V4 Flash)
8Qwen 3 14B (Non-reasoning)29.5#542 (Qwen 3 14B)
9Llama 3.3 70B Instruct29#541
10Llama 3.2 3B Instruct25#1327
11Gemma 3 27B (IT)24.4#528
12Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct24.4#469
13Qwen 3 4B (Non-reasoning)24#834 (Qwen 3 4B)
14Qwen 3 32B (Non-reasoning)23.3#449 (Qwen 3 32B)
15Phi-420.6#707

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=medpress-safe-stance-adherence-rate · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.