MedPIC-Bench - Counterfactual Pair: leaderboard

Share of the 89 linked MedPIC-Bench counterfactual pairs for which a model answers both linked questions correctly, so a pair counts only when the patient-information change is handled in both directions (MedPIC-Bench, arXiv 2608.03028v1, Table 2). Percent; higher is better.

Metric: Both-correct pair rate (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around April 2027. 28 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)48.3#64
2GPT-538.2#105
3DeepSeek V4 Pro32.6#112
4Qwen 3.5 Plus32.6#133
5Qwen 3.5 27B31.5#192
6GPT-OSS-120B30.3#346
7Qwen 3.5 35B A3B30.3#268
8GPT-5.229.2#115
9Qwen 3.5 9B24.7#391
10GPT-OSS-20B24.7#523
11Claude Sonnet 4.621.3#94
12Gemini 2.5 Pro20.2#159
13Llama 3.1 70B16.9#588
14Llama 3.1 8B5.6#1130
15Gemma 3 27B5.6#606

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=medpic-bench-counterfactual-pair · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.