MedMT-Bench - Contextual Interference: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%) on the 41 resistance-to-contextual-interference dialogues (injected history in a mismatched style or format) of MedMT-Bench's long multi-turn medical dialogues (health consultation, treatment recommendation and rehabilitation scenarios, text and image-text), where the final-turn reply is checked against fine-grained test points, judged by human annotators; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 7 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5 (High)60.98#91 (GPT-5)
2Gemini 2.5 Pro (Preview 06-05)60.98#101
3GPT-4.146.34#240
4Claude Sonnet 446.34#194
5O3 (2025-04-16)39.02#117
6Claude Opus 439.02#155
7GPT-4o (2024-11-20)21.95#369

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=medmt-bench-contextual-interference · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.