Medmarks - MedXpertQA Understanding: leaderboard

The "MedXpertQA Understanding" subtask of Medmarks. Living medical-model benchmark spanning verifiable and open-ended clinical evaluation families with model/system comparisons.

Metric: Score (%). Source: medmarks.ai. Saturation forecast: Around July 2027. 89 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)68.7#66
2Gemma 4 31B (IT)50.54#176
3Grok 447.09#181
4GPT-5.1 (Medium)43.63#135 (GPT-5.1)
5GLM-4.7 FP842.11#209
6GPT-5.2 (Medium)39.9#110 (GPT-5.2)
7Qwen 3.5 27B (Thinking)39.9#187 (Qwen 3.5 27B)
8Qwen 3.5 35B A3B (Thinking)38.99#256 (Qwen 3.5 35B A3B)
9Qwen 3.6 35B A3B (Thinking)37.8#226 (Qwen 3.6 35B A3B)
10Qwen 3.6 27B (Thinking)37.13#170 (Qwen 3.6 27B)
11Claude Sonnet 4.536.79#142
12Qwen 3 235B A22B (Thinking)36.45#313 (Qwen 3 235B A22B)
13GPT-OSS-120B (High)34.75#341 (GPT-OSS-120B)
14MiniMax-M2.134.24#289
15Muse Glimmer 30B (High)32.43#178 (Muse Glimmer 30B)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=medmarks-medxpertqa-understanding · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.