MedLoCoMo: leaderboard

MedLoCoMo (2026) tests long-context clinical reasoning over multi-admission patient histories: 100 synthetic doctor-patient conversations built from MIMIC-IV records, about 74,500 tokens each, with the full history in context. The score in percent combines judged accuracy on answerable questions with abstention accuracy on unanswerable ones over 17,892 questions; higher is better.

Metric: Score (%) over all 17,892 questions: item-weighted combination of judged accuracy on answerable questions (two per admission) and abstention accuracy on unanswerable ones (one per admission); full patient history in context (100 synthetic multi-admission doctor-patient conversations from MIMIC-IV, 74.5k tokens on average), short free-text answers; answerable items judged correct or not by a Gemini 3 Flash Preview judge, adversarial unanswerable items scored by abstention; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 13 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.172.8#229
2Qwen 3.5 27B68.1#359
3Qwen 3.5 9B51.8#803
4Qwen 3.5 4B48.8#1175
5Gemma 3 27B40.3#1631
6Gemma 3 12B35.7#2000
7MedGemma-4B18.4#2444
8Gemma 3 4B12.6#5064

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=medlocomo · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.