Med-CoReasoner - Global-MMLU-Medical - Chinese: leaderboard
Baseline results from the Med-CoReasoner paper (Gao et al., 2026) on the Chinese version of the medical-subject subset of Global-MMLU (1,505 multiple-choice items). Exact-match accuracy (%) with sampling temperature 0.7 and low reasoning effort for reasoning models; higher is better.
Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 9 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score | Overall rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.2 (Low) | 84.39 | #172 (GPT-5.2) |
| 2 | GPT-5.1 (Low) | 83.72 | #225 (GPT-5.1) |
| 3 | GPT-4o | 82.39 | #741 |
| 4 | DeepSeek V3.2 | 81.06 | #403 |
| 5 | Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct | 79.34 | #1093 |
| 6 | Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct | 77.21 | #1216 |
| 7 | Llama 3.1 70B Instruct | 73.02 | #1541 |
| 8 | Claude 3.5 Haiku | 64.78 | #1563 |
No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=med-coreasoner-global-mmlu-medical-chinese · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-12.