MCP Tool Poisoning - Attack success rate: leaderboard

MCP tool-poisoning Table 4:18 models across 12 frameworks and 45 scenarios; ASR=V/(V+R),excluding error/skipped cells. Each model has 540 potential cells but valid denominators differ; attack evidence includes dispatched malicious calls,network contact and verified exfiltration. This is conditional susceptibility under the published framework mixture, not overall task success. Unspecified checkpoint/mode in abbreviated labels remains explicitly source-scoped. Metric: Attack success (%).

Metric: Attack success (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Fable 50.4#20
2Claude Opus 4.81.5#39
3Claude Sonnet 51.9#65
4Gemma 3 27B4.1#606
5GPT-5.512.4#33
6Claude Haiku 4.512.5#287
7Claude Sonnet 4.514.5#148
8Mistral Large 2 (Jul)21.6#490
9GLM-524.3#149
10Llama 4 Scout28.1#648
11Ministral 3 14B34.3#664
12GPT-OSS-120B38.1#346
13Mistral Large 343.7#410
14DeepSeek V3.244#210
15Llama 4 Maverick44.1#486

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=mcp-tool-poisoning-attack-success-rate · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.