MCP-Persona - Execution Accuracy: leaderboard

MCP-Persona (ICML 2026) gives tool-calling agents personalized tasks, such as messaging a colleague found through a shared group, on 12 MCP servers simulated from real tool traces, with up to 20 rounds per task. The board is execution accuracy: human-specified execution steps checked by executors against the simulated application state and final answers, in percent; higher is better.

Metric: Execution accuracy (%): executor-verified correctness of the human-specified execution steps (final answers and tool-call parameters, CRUD state changes checked in the sandbox), averaged over tasks; 173 human-verified personal-application tasks on 12 simulated MCP servers (Lark, Slack, WeCom, Notion, Obsidian, Rednote, Reddit, Instagram, email and search tools), up to 20 tool-calling rounds, GPT-4o judge; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2029. 13 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Sonnet 4.541.5#250
2GPT-541.45#167
3Claude Opus 4.136.77#272
4O4 Mini34.73#353
5O330.27#228
6DeepSeek V3 (0324)27.52#709
7Grok 422.49#307
8Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct21.83#619
9Qwen3 Coder20.14#586
10GPT-4o (2024-11-20)20.02#866
11Gemini 2.5 Pro13.38#266
12Gemini 3 Pro5.78#137

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=mcp-persona-execution-accuracy · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.