MathArena - ARXIV March: leaderboard

Research-level math problems extracted from recent March arXiv papers with verifiable answers, testing LLMs on authentic mathematical research rather than competition problems.

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: matharena.ai. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 15 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.5 (xHigh)77.5#31 (GPT-5.5)
2Claude Opus 4.8 (Max)75#37 (Claude Opus 4.8)
3Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)68.33#58
4GPT-5.4 (xHigh)67.78#79 (GPT-5.4)
5Claude Opus 4.6 (High)62.5#63 (Claude Opus 4.6)
6GLM-5.261.67#73
7Gemini 3.5 Flash55.83#60
8DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)55.83#102 (DeepSeek V4 Pro)
9Kimi K2.6 (Thinking)55.83#104 (Kimi K2.6)
10DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)52.5#137 (DeepSeek V4 Flash)
11Claude Opus 4.7 (xHigh)50.83#49 (Claude Opus 4.7)
12GLM-5.149.17#97
13GLM-545.83#141
14Step 3.7 Flash45#236
15Step 3.5 Flash43.33#270

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=matharena-arxiv-march · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.