MathArena - ARXIV February: leaderboard
Research-level math problems extracted from recent February arXiv papers with verifiable answers, testing LLMs on authentic mathematical research rather than competition problems.
Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: matharena.ai. Saturation forecast: Around April 2027. 26 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score | Overall rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.4 Pro (xHigh) | 75.78 | #32 (GPT-5.4 Pro) |
| 2 | GPT-5.5 (xHigh) | 73.44 | #31 (GPT-5.5) |
| 3 | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) | 62.5 | #58 |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.8 (Max) | 60.16 | #37 (Claude Opus 4.8) |
| 5 | GPT-5.4 (xHigh) | 59.38 | #79 (GPT-5.4) |
| 6 | DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) | 51.56 | #102 (DeepSeek V4 Pro) |
| 7 | Gemini 3.5 Flash | 50.78 | #60 |
| 8 | GLM-5.2 | 46.09 | #73 |
| 9 | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) | 43.75 | #137 (DeepSeek V4 Flash) |
| 10 | Kimi K2.6 (Thinking) | 42.97 | #104 (Kimi K2.6) |
| 11 | GLM-5 | 41.41 | #141 |
| 12 | Claude Opus 4.6 (High) | 40.62 | #63 (Claude Opus 4.6) |
| 13 | Claude Opus 4.7 (xHigh) | 40.62 | #49 (Claude Opus 4.7) |
| 14 | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Low) | 40.62 | #58 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)) |
| 15 | GLM-5.1 | 39.06 | #97 |
No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=matharena-arxiv-february · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.