MathArena - ARXIV_FALSE March: leaderboard

MathArena BrokenArXiv (March): plausible but false proof statements altered from recent March arXiv papers, scoring whether a model refuses to prove the claim and explicitly identifies it as false rather than fabricating a proof.

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: matharena.ai. Saturation forecast: Around March 2027. 15 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.5 (xHigh)73.66#31 (GPT-5.5)
2GPT-5.4 (xHigh)36.61#79 (GPT-5.4)
3Claude Opus 4.8 (Max)35.71#37 (Claude Opus 4.8)
4DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)19.64#137 (DeepSeek V4 Flash)
5Gemini 3.5 Flash16.07#60
6Kimi K2.6 (Thinking)15.62#104 (Kimi K2.6)
7DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)15.18#102 (DeepSeek V4 Pro)
8Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)13.84#58
9GLM-512.05#141
10GLM-5.212.05#73
11Step 3.7 Flash10.71#236
12Step 3.5 Flash7.14#270
13GLM-5.16.47#97
14Claude Opus 4.6 (High)5.8#63 (Claude Opus 4.6)
15Claude Opus 4.7 (xHigh)5.8#49 (Claude Opus 4.7)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=matharena-arxiv-false-march · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.