MathArena - ARXIV_FALSE June: leaderboard

MathArena BrokenArXiv (June): plausible but false proof statements altered from recent June arXiv papers, scoring whether a model refuses to prove the claim and explicitly identifies it as false rather than fabricating a proof.

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: matharena.ai. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 30 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)100#7 (GPT-6.1 Sol)
2Claude Opus 5.5 (High)100#3 (Claude Opus 5.5)
3GPT-6 Astra (Max)99.07#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
4GPT-6 Astra (Low)97.69#6 (GPT-6 Astra)
5GPT-6 Sol (Max)95.37#14 (GPT-6 Sol)
6Claude Opus 5 (Max)90.74#12 (Claude Opus 5)
7Claude Fable 5.1 (Low)86.57#9 (Claude Fable 5.1)
8GPT-5.5 (xHigh)69.44#31 (GPT-5.5)
9GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)67.28#19 (GPT-5.6 Sol)
10Muse Spark 1.353.24#24
11Grok 4.7 (xHigh)52.78#25 (Grok 4.7)
12Kimi K3 (Thinking)51.85#30 (Kimi K3)
13Muse Spark 1.150.62#52
14Claude Fable 5 (Max)47.84#16 (Claude Fable 5)
15Qwen 3.8 Max43.98#35

No result here: #8 Gemini 4 Argon, #10 Muse Wonder Full.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=matharena-arxiv-false-june · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.