MapSatisfyBench - Acceptance Rate: leaderboard
MapSatisfyBench (2026) gives map-service agents informal, underspecified requests rebuilt from real user behavior and checks whether they recover the unstated needs through 22 replayed map tools and a simulated user, with GPT-5.3 as judge. This board is the accepted-response score in percent: per request, explicit-requirement completion times implicit-need satisfaction; higher is better.
Metric: Accepted-response score (%): per instance the explicit-completion rate times the weighted implicit-factor satisfaction, averaged over instances; underspecified map-service requests rebuilt from real anonymized user behavior chains, answered by a ReAct agent with 22 deterministic replayed map tools and a simulated user; GPT-5.3 simulates the user and judges (majority of three judgments), temperature 1; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 15 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score | Overall rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 67.49 | #102 |
| 2 | DeepSeek V4 Pro (Non-reasoning) | 66.06 | #188 (DeepSeek V4 Pro) |
| 3 | Qwen 3.6 Plus (Thinking) | 62.78 | #222 (Qwen 3.6 Plus) |
| 4 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 61.69 | #161 |
| 5 | DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) | 61.2 | #406 (DeepSeek V3.2) |
| 6 | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Thinking) | 60.84 | #94 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)) |
| 7 | Qwen 3.6 Plus (Non-reasoning) | 60.82 | #222 (Qwen 3.6 Plus) |
| 8 | Qwen 3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) | 57.69 | #623 (Qwen 3 235B A22B) |
| 9 | GPT-4.1 | 56.83 | #495 |
| 10 | Qwen 3 8B (Non-reasoning) | 30.93 | #1830 (Qwen 3 8B) |
| 11 | Qwen 3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) | 28.21 | #1122 (Qwen 3 30B A3B) |
No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=mapsatisfybench-acceptance-rate · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.