M3-AD-Bench - Texture: leaderboard

Metric: Balanced accuracy (%) of binary anomaly detection (is the image defective?), the mean of the recall on normal and on anomalous images, on the surface-texture scene, zero-shot on M3-AD-Bench, the evaluation split of M3-AD (industrial images re-annotated from public anomaly-detection datasets under one taxonomy; its categories are held out from the M3-AD-FT training split), one structured answer per image; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 19 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3 VL 32B Instruct87.3#276
2Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking)86
3Qwen 3 VL 4B Instruct83.1#506
4Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite81.5#413
5Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct80.4#364
6Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct75.9#643
7Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct70.5#401
8Qwen 3 VL 4B (Thinking)68#471 (Qwen 3 VL 4B)
9Qwen 2 VL 7B Instruct64.1#816

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=m3-ad-bench-texture · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.