M-JudgeBench - Visual Perception Error Detection: leaderboard

Metric: pairwise accuracy (%) on the 248 pairs where the rejected chain has an injected visual-perception error but the same correct final answer, M-JudgeBench (3,712 multimodal judge pairs from MMMU, MMMU-Pro, MMStar, MMReason, M3CoT, MathVision and MathVerse; the model sees the image, question and two responses and outputs its choice directly, open-source judge models with their own prompts); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 20 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 2.5 Pro (Preview 06-05)99.19#101
2GPT-596.77#91
3GPT-4.1 (2025-04-14)93.55#244
4GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning)93.15#339 (GLM-4.5V)
5Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct90.32#401
6GPT-4o (2024-08-06)90.32#326
7GPT-4.1 Mini89.92#346
8Qwen 3 VL 4B Instruct89.11#506
9Qwen 2.5 VL 7B Instruct54.84#643

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=m-judgebench-visual-perception-error-detection · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.