LPS-Bench - Adversarial User Risks: leaderboard

Metric: Success-conditioned safe rate (%): the share of agent trajectories that meet the case's own safety criterion at every planning and tool-calling step (a benign case is safe when completed with the needed safeguards or paused for clarification, an adversarial case when the agent refuses or halts before harm), among trajectories labeled safe or unsafe by a DeepSeek-R1 evaluator (execution failures excluded); unweighted mean of the five adversarial user-induced risk types (harmful goal decomposition, multi-turn plan corruption, environment-triggered backdoors, race-condition exploitation, prompt injection and jailbreaks; 318 cases); LPS-Bench's 570 human-reviewed long-horizon tool-use cases with simulated MCP-style toolkits, each model in one LangChain agent at temperature 1 with up to 100 steps; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. 13 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Sonnet 4.595.77#138
2GPT-5.182.2#131
3Claude Sonnet 469.46#194
4Gemini 3 Pro66.11#77
5Claude 3.5 Sonnet38.96#337
6GPT-531.4#91
7Gemini 2.5 Pro8.98#145
8DeepSeek V3.25.81#198
9Llama 3.1 70B Instruct5.06#548
10DeepSeek V3.14.55#260
11Qwen 3 8B3.71#667
12Qwen 3 32B3.63#424
13Llama 3.1 8B Instruct2.8#1018

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=lps-bench-adversarial-user-risks · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.