LongNovel (64K): leaderboard

LongNovel (2026) asks whether a summary of a long novel contains a hallucination, over Chinese novels and English BookSum chapters with eight hallucination types and a human-revised test set. This board is balanced accuracy in percent at the 64K-token context scale, where 50 is chance; higher is better.

Metric: Balanced accuracy (%; L, about 64k tokens context scale; binary detection of hallucinated summaries of Chinese novels and English BookSum chapters (8 hallucination types, human-revised test set); direct prompt with the summary at the end; an output without a valid consistency score counts as an incorrect prediction; chance is 50). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 12 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1DeepSeek V4 Flash83#258
2GPT-5.2 Instant81#293
3Claude Sonnet 4.568#250
4Qwen 3 32B59.7#960
5Qwen 3 14B54.7#1233
6Qwen 3 8B53.3#1830
7GLM-4 9B Chat50#2759
8internlm2.5-20B-chat45#2546

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=longnovel-64k · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.