LongBench Pro - English - Thinking: leaderboard

Evaluates long-context understanding across English and Chinese tasks at four difficulty levels. Non-thinking and thinking results use separate published columns; missing settings remain absent. This series reports English - Thinking using Score (%). Source: the original paper result table.

Metric: Score (%). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around February 2027. 46 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-573.24#105
2Gemini 2.5 Pro72.35#159
3Claude Sonnet 471.09#207
4DeepSeek V3.267.89#210
5Gemini 2.5 Flash67.22#255
6Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 (Thinking)66.83#263
7DeepSeek V3.166.17#275
8Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct63.88#315
9Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B (Thinking)62.91#312
10DeepSeek R162#262
11Claude 3.7 Sonnet60.49#259
12Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B Instruct60.3#381
13Qwen 3 30B A3B 2507 (Thinking)60.14#379
14DeepSeek R1 052859.9#232
15DeepSeek V3 (0324)58.14#349

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=longbench-pro-english-thinking · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-05.