LLMEval-Logic Hard Sub-Q: leaderboard

LLMEval logic-reasoning leaderboard (llmeval.com) — hard set scored on decomposed sub-questions; accuracy (%).

Metric: Accuracy (%). Source: llmeval.com. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 14 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)76.6#63 (Claude Opus 4.6)
2Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Thinking)76#58 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
3Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning)74.4#63 (Claude Opus 4.6)
4Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) (Low)71.3#58 (Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview))
5Qwen 3.5 Plus (Thinking)70#125 (Qwen 3.5 Plus)
6Kimi K2.5 (Thinking)68.4#144 (Kimi K2.5)
7Seed 2.0 Pro (Thinking)63.3#118 (Seed 2.0 Pro)
8Hy3-preview (Reasoning)62.7#157 (Hy3-preview)
9Seed 2.0 Pro (Non-reasoning)39.4#118 (Seed 2.0 Pro)
10Qwen 3.5 Plus (Non-reasoning)33.7#125 (Qwen 3.5 Plus)
11Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning)27.4#157 (Hy3-preview)
12Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)27#144 (Kimi K2.5)

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=llmeval-logic-hard-sub-q · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-20.