LiveCodeBench Pro: leaderboard

Competitive coding problems at extreme difficulty. 'Hard' here means 99.9% of competitive coders can't solve them. Shows how LLMs stack up against elite human programmers.

Metric: Rating (CF-style). Source: web.archive.org. Saturation forecast: Around April 2027. 58 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Gemini 3 Deep Think3298#24
2Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview)2887#58
3Gemini 3 Pro (Preview)2439#65
4GPT-5.2 (High)2393#110 (GPT-5.2)
5Gemini 3 Flash (Preview)2316#82
6GPT-5.1 (2025-11-13) (High)2269#102 (GPT-5.1 (2025-11-13))
7GPT-5 (High)2176#98 (GPT-5)
8O4 Mini (2025-04-16) (High)2092#178 (O4 Mini (2025-04-16))
9Gemini 2.5 Pro1769#151
10Gemini 2.5 Pro (Preview 03-25)1694#123
11O3 Mini (2025-01-31)1688#239
12Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507 (Thinking)1673#260 (Qwen 3 235B A22B 2507)
13Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B (Thinking)1603#320 (Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B)
14Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)1412#141 (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
15Gemini 2.5 Flash (Preview 04-17)1334#234

No result here: #4 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 Gemini 4 Argon.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=livecodebench-pro · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-21.