LingxiDiagBench (Dynamic, APA-Guided) - 4-Class Accuracy: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%, 0-100) on four-way classification (pure depression, pure anxiety, mixed depression-anxiety, other) after the consultation; LingxiDiagBench-Dynamic on LingxiDiag-16K cases: the model leads a multi-turn consultation with a Qwen3-32B patient agent built from the case EMR, then diagnoses; doctor strategy: the five-phase APA-guided interview (screening, assessment, deep-dive, risk assessment, closure); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around 2035. 13 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1DeepSeek V3.231.5#198
2Qwen 3 32B31.5#424
3GPT-5 Mini30#176
4Grok 4.1 Fast30#208
5Claude Haiku 4.527#271
6Gemini 3 Flash26.5#93
7Kimi K2 (Thinking)25#236 (Kimi K2)
8Qwen 3 1.7B25#1186
9GPT-OSS-20B21.5#499
10Qwen 3 4B20.5#823
11Qwen 3 8B20#667

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=lingxidiagbench-dynamic-apa-guided-4-class-accuracy · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.