LingxiDiagBench (Dynamic, APA-Guided) - 12-Class Accuracy: leaderboard

Metric: Accuracy (%, 0-100) on twelve-category ICD-10 diagnosis (F20, F31, F32, F39, F41, F42, F43, F45, F51, F98, Z71, others; multi-label, exact match of the predicted label set) after the consultation; LingxiDiagBench-Dynamic on LingxiDiag-16K cases: the model leads a multi-turn consultation with a Qwen3-32B patient agent built from the case EMR, then diagnoses; doctor strategy: the five-phase APA-guided interview (screening, assessment, deep-dive, risk assessment, closure); higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around November 2027. 13 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Grok 4.1 Fast24#208
2Claude Haiku 4.523.5#271
3GPT-5 Mini23.5#176
4DeepSeek V3.223#198
5Qwen 3 32B17.5#424
6Kimi K2 (Thinking)15.5#236 (Kimi K2)
7Gemini 3 Flash14.5#93
8GPT-OSS-20B10#499
9Qwen 3 1.7B7#1186
10Qwen 3 8B0.5#667
11Qwen 3 4B0#823

No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=lingxidiagbench-dynamic-apa-guided-12-class-accuracy · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.