LifeEval (Multiple-Choice) - Safety and Feasibility Assessment: leaderboard
Metric: Accuracy (%) on the 328 multiple-choice Safety and Feasibility Assessment questions of LifeEval, zero-shot, the model sees only the egocentric clip up to the question time (8 uniformly sampled frames for models without native video input), answer in fixed tags; higher is better. Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Estimated already saturated. 26 models tracked.
Top models
| # | Model | Score | Overall rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | 89.02 | #145 |
| 2 | GPT-5 | 84.45 | #91 |
| 3 | Gemini 2.5 Flash | 82.62 | #237 |
| 4 | GPT-5 Mini | 82.01 | #176 |
| 5 | Grok 4 | 79.88 | #169 |
| 6 | Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B (Thinking) | 78.66 | #338 (Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B) |
| 7 | GPT-4o | 77.74 | #333 |
| 8 | Qwen 3 VL 30B A3B Instruct | 75.87 | #365 |
| 9 | Qwen 3 VL 8B (Thinking) | 73.48 | |
| 10 | Qwen 3 VL 8B Instruct | 66.77 | #401 |
No result here: #3 Claude Opus 5.5, #5 GPT-6 Astra, #8 Claude Fable 5.1.
Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=lifeeval-multiple-choice-safety-and-feasibility-assessment · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-11.