LexRubric - Task Compliance: leaderboard

LexRubric (2026) scores open-ended answers to 649 Chinese legal questions from everyday legal consultation and judicial examination against expert-written atomic rubric items, each checked by an LLM judge. This board counts only the rubric items of the task compliance dimension. The score rate is earned rubric points (negative items subtract) over the maximum positive score in percent, averaged over instances; higher is better.

Metric: Dimension score rate (%): points earned from expert-written atomic rubric items of the task compliance dimension (weighted -10 to +10; negative items subtract) divided by the maximum positive score, averaged over instances; a Qwen3.6-27B judge checks each item, temperature 0.6, 16k output tokens; can fall below 0; higher is better (instances without a positive item in the dimension are left out). Source: arxiv.org. Saturation forecast: Around July 2027. 18 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1Qwen 3.6 Max Preview87.3#159
2Kimi K2.686.97#178
3Kimi K2.586.94#256
4Qwen 3 Max84.06#403
5GLM-5.182.83#179
6Qwen 3.5 397B A17B82.32#246
7Claude Sonnet 4.681.91#161
8DeepSeek V4 Flash80.01#258
9DeepSeek V4 Pro78.2#188
10GPT-5.277.68#176
11GLM-577.01#260
12DeepSeek R175.49#473
13DeepSeek V3.275.35#406

No result here: #1 Claude Fable 5.2, #2 Gemini 4 Carbon, #5 Claude Opus 5.5.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=lexrubric-task-compliance · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-11-13.