LegalScope - Argument Validity: leaderboard

LegalScope: 28 model configurations; automatic grading on 861 exam and 276 case prompts, human validation on 80 exam and 10 case prompts with two lawyers. Scores scaled 0-100. August generation logs explicitly distinguish non-thinking and Low/Medium/High settings; unspecified older settings remain unspecified. Later provider defaults do not rewrite the experiment.. Score (%).

Metric: Score (%). Source: raw.githubusercontent.com. Saturation forecast: Around January 2027. 28 models tracked.

Top models

#ModelScoreOverall rank
1GPT-5.5 (High)94.1#29 (GPT-5.5)
2GPT-5.5 (Medium)92.7#29 (GPT-5.5)
3GPT-5.4 Mini84.9#212
4GLM-5.3 (Low)83.2#36 (GLM-5.3)
5Grok 4.581.3#49
6DeepSeek V4 Pro (Non-reasoning)78.9#106 (DeepSeek V4 Pro)
7Qwen 3 Max74.5#210
8Qwen 3 Max (Thinking)74.2#210 (Qwen 3 Max)
9Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium)72.6#61 (Gemini 3.5 Flash)
10DeepSeek V3.272.4#204
11Kimi K2 (Thinking)72.1#243 (Kimi K2)
12Gemini 2.5 Flash72#242
13Gemini 3 Flash (Low)71.7#101 (Gemini 3 Flash)
14Qwen 3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)71.6#118 (Qwen 3.8 27B)
15Gemini 3 Flash71.3#101

No result here: #4 Claude Opus 5.5, #6 GPT-6 Astra, #7 GPT-6.1 Sol.

Interactive version: theaggregate.ai/benchmark?slug=legalscope-argument-validity · How It Works · Data refreshed daily, snapshot 2026-10-23.